wedontcareaboutyourbinary:

cisphobeofficial:

apersnicketylemon:

wedontcareaboutyourbinary:

awkwardangelseekingdean:

wedontcareaboutyourbinary:

To jump off of that: The disdain for MOGAI labels means that literally any vocabulary younger than 3-5 years (and sometimes even up to 10-15 years), and ESPECIALLY any language associated with non-binary people, multi-attraction, or attraction based on factors that are not binary genders, gets automatically derided and dismissed.

And that’s just among LGBT+ folk. Cis straight people dismiss all that language automatically as ridiculous alphabet soup stuff, whether or not they know the phrase MOGAI to mock it with.

Can you see how this is a direct enemy of NB people — a community that (in this specific contemporary iteration of that concept) has only begun to articulate itself at all in the last 20 years, and only really picked up big steam in the last 5-10 — describing themselves at all?

Like if the cut-off for respectable LGBT language was 2000, and anything more recent than that is MOGAI bullshit…. modern NBs just aren’t allowed to talk about themselves whatsoever, because any word coined after 2000, especially if it was coined on tumblr, is just ~snowflakey MOGAI radikweers making up ridiculous nonsense words for overspecific concepts?~

If you’re an enemy of new specific language for new specific concepts, you’re an enemy of NBs. If you’re an enemy of reconsidering the usefulness of a gay-bi-straight orientation trinary, you’re an enemy of NBs. If you’re an enemy of “microlabels”, ie newly coined labels that don’t apply to you personally 🙄, you’re an enemy of NBs. If you’re not willing to imagine that the language NBs are coining for themselves right now can grow to be just as important and codified and significant as the language that lesbians and gay men use, and you’re not willing to lift it up, to be encouraging about its usage and include it where it’s applicable and appropriate, you’re an enemy of NBs. I don’t know what else to tell you.

What is MOGAI?

Originally MOGAI was coined as an alternative to LGBT+. It meant the same thing. It stood for “Marginalized Orientations, Genders and Intersex”, I believe?

However, it was immediately met with STRONG negative stigma because of an association with, essentially, newer or more niche identity labels. If you were Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual or (binary) Trans, you were less likely to see a need for an alternative to LGBT. Therefore, it was more likely to be used by people not already totally included in that “mainstream” group. Non-binary folks, people on the ace and aro spectrums, people who used a split attraction model, people whose queer identities were impacted by neurodivergence, etc, were all more likely to like the phrase MOGAI.

So as a result, it became a way to colloquially refer — whether derogatorily or as a reclamation — to those less mainstream identities. Pretty much anything that’s not L, G, B or T.

I would like to note it’s also being used against people who are L, G, B, or T, if you say anything exclusionists don’t like… as an insult. I’ve been told ‘being a lesbian doesn’t exclude you from being a mogai’ as an insult, which… I mean, Lesbian is a marginalized orientation, but I’m fairly sure that’s not what they meant (and likely they had no idea what it even stood for).

The arguments against it are also all false. They have either falsely attributed real arguments against completely different terms, or straight up made shit up about MOGAI in order to discredit it as ‘silly nonsense’.

As it is though calling oneself ‘Anti-Mogai’ is a HUGE indicator that this person is VERY nbphobic, and generally very panphobic as well as aphobic. Typically their arguments will be heavily based too in right wing anti-gay and anti-trans arguments, or will be ‘by you existing, we can’t pander to the cis, and you’re the reason transphobia exists as a result!!’

Marginalized Orientation, Gender *Alignment*, and Intersex, actually, but otherwise yes ^^

Thanks for these additions!! Yes!

(As a note, thanks for reminding me: Gender Alignment in this case refers to how your gender aligns with cisnormativity and assignment. IE being non-cis. Not like “woman-aligned”/“man-aligned” NB vocab.)

Because of the associations I talked about, MOGAI as a concept does also end up wrapped up in far-reaching ideas about what queer identity signifies, philosophies of inclusionism (beyond mere ace discourse), anti-assimilationism, and general attitudes toward queerness that are… incongruent with assimilationist, gatekeeping, reductive and radfem-leaning belief systems.

So if you’re into those conservative beliefs, then yes, the sprawling queer free-for-all associated with “MOGAI” is very threatening and gross indeed.

apersnicketylemon:

wedontcareaboutyourbinary:

awkwardangelseekingdean:

wedontcareaboutyourbinary:

To jump off of that: The disdain for MOGAI labels means that literally any vocabulary younger than 3-5 years (and sometimes even up to 10-15 years), and ESPECIALLY any language associated with non-binary people, multi-attraction, or attraction based on factors that are not binary genders, gets automatically derided and dismissed.

And that’s just among LGBT+ folk. Cis straight people dismiss all that language automatically as ridiculous alphabet soup stuff, whether or not they know the phrase MOGAI to mock it with.

Can you see how this is a direct enemy of NB people — a community that (in this specific contemporary iteration of that concept) has only begun to articulate itself at all in the last 20 years, and only really picked up big steam in the last 5-10 — describing themselves at all?

Like if the cut-off for respectable LGBT language was 2000, and anything more recent than that is MOGAI bullshit…. modern NBs just aren’t allowed to talk about themselves whatsoever, because any word coined after 2000, especially if it was coined on tumblr, is just ~snowflakey MOGAI radikweers making up ridiculous nonsense words for overspecific concepts?~

If you’re an enemy of new specific language for new specific concepts, you’re an enemy of NBs. If you’re an enemy of reconsidering the usefulness of a gay-bi-straight orientation trinary, you’re an enemy of NBs. If you’re an enemy of “microlabels”, ie newly coined labels that don’t apply to you personally 🙄, you’re an enemy of NBs. If you’re not willing to imagine that the language NBs are coining for themselves right now can grow to be just as important and codified and significant as the language that lesbians and gay men use, and you’re not willing to lift it up, to be encouraging about its usage and include it where it’s applicable and appropriate, you’re an enemy of NBs. I don’t know what else to tell you.

What is MOGAI?

Originally MOGAI was coined as an alternative to LGBT+. It meant the same thing. It stood for “Marginalized Orientations, Genders and Intersex”, I believe?

However, it was immediately met with STRONG negative stigma because of an association with, essentially, newer or more niche identity labels. If you were Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual or (binary) Trans, you were less likely to see a need for an alternative to LGBT. Therefore, it was more likely to be used by people not already totally included in that “mainstream” group. Non-binary folks, people on the ace and aro spectrums, people who used a split attraction model, people whose queer identities were impacted by neurodivergence, etc, were all more likely to like the phrase MOGAI.

So as a result, it became a way to colloquially refer — whether derogatorily or as a reclamation — to those less mainstream identities. Pretty much anything that’s not L, G, B or T.

I would like to note it’s also being used against people who are L, G, B, or T, if you say anything exclusionists don’t like… as an insult. I’ve been told ‘being a lesbian doesn’t exclude you from being a mogai’ as an insult, which… I mean, Lesbian is a marginalized orientation, but I’m fairly sure that’s not what they meant (and likely they had no idea what it even stood for).

The arguments against it are also all false. They have either falsely attributed real arguments against completely different terms, or straight up made shit up about MOGAI in order to discredit it as ‘silly nonsense’.

As it is though calling oneself ‘Anti-Mogai’ is a HUGE indicator that this person is VERY nbphobic, and generally very panphobic as well as aphobic. Typically their arguments will be heavily based too in right wing anti-gay and anti-trans arguments, or will be ‘by you existing, we can’t pander to the cis, and you’re the reason transphobia exists as a result!!’

Marginalized Orientation, Gender *Alignment*, and Intersex, actually, but otherwise yes ^^

Like the idea of Mastodon, but too used to the tumblr format? Check out Plume!

socalledunitedstates:

Plume is an open-source, federated, user-run blogging platform. There are no ads, no data harvesting, posts come to you in chronological order, NSFW is and always will be allowed (depending on the instance), and it has a lot of tumblr-like features other sites lack: no character limit, a rich text editor with bold/italic/hyperlinks/etc, inline pictures, headers, tags at the bottom that can be used to organize posts on your blog, comments, likes, sideblogs, and so on. It’s still under very active development too, meaning more features are on their way!

But what about the userbase? You may ask. I’ve never even heard of Plume – is it completely dead? The answer is yes and no – there aren’t that many people on Plume, true, but that doesn’t matter. Plume uses ActivityPub, the same standard used by Mastodon and the other sites on the fediverse – what that means is people on Mastodon can follow you, see your posts, and like/comment them from Mastodon. Same with other platforms like WriteFreely, PixelFed, Hubzilla, Diaspora, Pleroma, Friendica, etc, etc. And I can tell you from experience, the fediverse is bumpin’; you won’t have to worry about your audience

The problems with tumblr are inherent with centralized corporate social media, and switching to another corporate master won’t solve them. What you need to do is stop giving power to profit-motivated companies to control your experience. Take that power back yourself on the fediverse! Join Plume!!!

Please signal boost and tell your friends who want to leave tumblr about Plume!

thefingerfuckingfemalefury:

just-watch-me-hachiko:

rosapotentis:

manrepellent:

mjalti:

I really … don’t know what the mom expected… I really do not

Is Abcde a stupid name? Yes, of course it is.

Does that give the employee the right to post a photo of the girl’s full name online in order to mock it ok? Absolutely not.

Apparently the employee had a habit of taking photos of people at work and making fun of them, and the mom only contacted the airline when she found that out. That is perfectly reasonable. The employee should absolutely be fired.

But also, don’t give your kids names like Abcde.

There are no heroes in this story

The only innocent in this tale is the poor kid who can’t help the fact her parents think naming their kid Ab City and spelling it Abcde is Acceptable