twocubes:

foolishmeowing:

twocubes:

i mean, things could be worse

there was a paper some time ago that suggested that basically every icy satellite-or-large-rock from jupiter’s orbit outwards to pluto all the way to the rest of the oort cloud has a chance of having a subsurface ocean that is (or was) kept warm enough to stay liquid just via their core being hot

but the thing is that all those rocks have been slowly cooling off since their formation, so more of them had warmer oceans in the past. 

also, given that in order to form, life needs a sufficiently large amount of energy-per-square-foot to sustain itself (but not too much energy) then in fact, the solar system had way more places where life could have emerged than you’d have expected looking just at the surfaces of our rocks.

thus, well, most of the life in the solar system evolved to survive in the dark of a subsurface ocean somewhere where our entire ecosystem was doomed to freeze and die millions of years ago without ever getting to even see the rest of the universe. probably.

you get to see the universe before the sun runs out, and it’s been a more reliable source of power for you than what would have been available if you’d evolved on a place like most of the rest of the life out there has, yknow? i mean i know you believe you’ve had it hard; you’ve evolved for these conditions and therefore your notion of hardness is adapted to your environment so of course. that’s the same for everybody. all forms of life i mean.

but things could be worse

something about the way you’re saying “you…”

to survive in the dark of a subsurface ocean somewhere where our entire ecosystem was doomed to freeze and die millions of years ago

…..!!!

their. 

i meant their. 

i dont know what you’re implying i mean there’s nothing suspicious here. you’re being paranoid.

how would i even have gotten an internet connection from that sort of deep sea environment? if i were on earth. and i needed that sort of environment. because that’s where we’d evolved. 

which we didn’t! i meant that rhetorically.

i mean who would believe that, haha

deep sea aliens emigrating from frozen dead transjovian worlds and resenting those who’d emerged in more favorable conditions. that sounds like something you’d read in a story. a fictional story. with nothing to do with reality.

haha

something’s really weird with the vanilla extract i’ve got, the color keeps way overpowering stuff that it normally wouldn’t??

like i made frosting with it that would normally come out white, did everything the way i normally would, and it came out light brown

same w/ white cake batter and idgi???

queer-taako:

herefortheace:

can you believe how many shitty ppl there are who think ace/aro headcanons are desexualizing and degrading

Bonus points if they conflate “autistic ace person or ace person of color seeing themselves in characters and hcing them as such while on their path to reclaiming their sexuality” with “desexualization.”

Desexualization, along with sexualization, serve to rob the individual of any agency and make them a nameless object rather than a person. It is censorship. It is saying “you are a member of x group, therefor you automatically conform to the stereotypes related to sexuality that i associate with your group.” It’s dehumanizing. And its especially pertinent for aspec people of color, and aspec autistic people. Getting mad about headcanons is a symptom of a larger issue. Autistics are frequently desexualized, while people of color tend to be both desexualized or hypersexualized, sometimes both at the same time. When aspec autistics or people of color express their aspec identity, take pride in it, feel good knowing theres a word and a community for them, they are reclaiming their sexuality, their agency.

Im not saying don’t be mindful of headcanons, but a lot of the time, people like to see themselves in their favorite characters. So like. If it ain’t hurting anyone leave em be.

girlfriendluvr:

girlfriendluvr:

girlfriendluvr:

REVIEWS FOR VENOM JUST CAME IN AND IT’S A 28% ON ROTTEN TOMATOES!!!!!! THIS MOVIES GONNA BE SO FUCKIN FUNNY IM SO EXCITED. GOD I LOVE TERRIBLE SPIDERMAN MOVIES

“If you replaced Tom Hardy for Steve Martin in “All of Me,” and switched out Lily Tomlin for a wad of chewed-up black licorice, you’d have “Venom.”“

“When a major fight scene resembles a pair of black pants caught in a white wash, it’s fair to say you haven’t taken the audience with you.”

“It’s a train wreck of a movie, mixing and matching wildly dissonant tones, bizarre plot contrivances, and a truly unique lead performance.”

“Tom Hardy seems to be trying to be the first actor to win an Oscar and a Razzie for the same performance.”

“A film that feels like what you’d expect from a below average superhero flick circa 2004, like Ghost Rider or Fantastic Four.”

^ some of my fave critic review excerpts. i have never been more excited

some more

“The movie is so ridiculous that many viewers will at least be entertained in a dumbfounded way.”

“Think Affleck Daredevil. Think Ang Lee Hulk. Think Halle Berry Catwoman. That’s… I mean, that’s really all there is to be said, I think.”

“This is a movie that somehow slipped through a wormhole from 2004. That’s my biggest take. It’s a movie that spilled from the pre-MCU era through a crack in time and space… The humor, the story beats, everything right down to the Eminem theme song feels like it emerged Kimmy Schmidt style from a sealed off early ‘00s bunker.”

“Sorry to say that Venom is pretty much a complete failure — a tonal mess that feels 15 years old, ignoring the storytelling strides that the superhero genre has made in recent years.”

“Not sure I had the intended reactions to some scenes, but fun is fun — even when it’s totally ridiculous, right? It’s too bad they didn’t go for the R rating, though.”

“The cast seems to all know they’re in a darker superhero movie, except Tom Hardy who is basically remaking Jim Carrey’s Liar Liar.”

“At one point Tom Hardy and Venom make out.”